« June 2007 | Main | August 2007 »

July 28, 2007

Women Writers Unite -- summer anthologies with a female perspective

This blog post was inspired by a 2-hour radio program and a bookstore event both which featured collected stories from several well respected writers (who all also happen to be women).

Anthologies are hot.

Women writers are hot.

Intense sharing sessions on paper and in person have become a recent theme.  Nearly simultaneously, at least three anthologies by women writers were released this summer.

 Bad GirlsThe Other WomanTighter The Sweater

  • Bad Girls: 26 Writers Misbehave
  • The Other Woman: 21 Wives, Lovers, and Others Talk Openly About Sex, Deception, Love and Betrayl
  • The Bigger the Better, the Tighter the Sweater: 21 Funny Women on Beauty, Body Image and Other Hazards of Being Female

I don't know about you... but generally I enjoy a good anthology.  Anthologies (a collection of literary works usually by numerous writers) can be a great way to discover new writers. And, they usually offer a dose of thoughtful prose on the morning commute or before heading to bed. 

According to industry insiders, the success of the Best American Series – which has introduced annual tomes of best magazine writing, best non-required reading, best travel writing, best science writing, best sports writing, and so on – has spurred NY publishers to snap up any book proposal from a well respected writer who’s willing to cajole friends and colleagues into a small literary contribution to a larger work.

The book events for anthologies can be interesting too.  Instead of 1 hour, 1 author, there are a handful of writers on stage who read a snippet of their essay (often with very personal and intimate details) – and the Q&A hopefully ensues into an actual conversation between writers.  As Ellen Sussman described the experience for writers whose professions demand a fairly solitary existence, “It’s great to be on tour with my posse.” 

A fair warning, the above mentioned collections are highly estrogen filled.  But, the collections tackle tough subjects including rocky relationships, body issues, cheating lovers, disappearing youth and survival.  The stories are often humorous and always intimately personal.     And, most importantly, they touch on a shared female experience to which all women can relate.

July 16, 2007

LitMinds partners with SJSU's Campus Reading program

As you’ve probably noticed, LitMinds is growing by leaps and bounds.  Since our launch in February, we’ve expanded the community tremendously to include new things like author and bookstore profiles, email notifications, and, not least of all, many new members.  

San Jose State UniversityBut we’ve also been growing in ways that aren’t so obvious.  One of the new projects we’re doing is partnering with the Campus Reading program at San Jose State University.  Campus Reading programs, which are cropping up at schools and cities across the country, seek to foster connections, both intellectual and otherwise, among members of a community and to promote a culture of reading.   At SJSU, every year all members of the university – students, faculty and staff – are encouraged to read the same book over the summer.  When the school year begins, readers participate in discussion groups and events inside and outside of the classroom such as plays and author talks to analyze the book and how it affected them.  This year, the book SJSU has chosen is ZZ Packer’s Drinking Coffee Elsewhere, a collection of short stories.

LitMinds has partnered with SJSU to add an important element to the discussions of Packer’s book: an online component.  Earlier this year, you may have noticed several posts on the board about Toni Morrison’s Beloved.  Those were part of a pilot program we did with an English literature course at SJSU.  For Campus Reading, we intend to play a similar role, providing a home in our community for online discussions of the book, both for classes using it as part of the curriculum, and for members of discussion groups.  You’ll see a few of these discussions on the home page, where the most recently updated topics are displayed; the rest will be on a new board earmarked for the SJSU Campus Reading program.   

Drinking Coffee ElsewhereWe at LitMinds are very excited to be involved in the program, and we hope you’ll enjoy seeing – and participating in - some of the discussions, as well.  Campus Reading programs are a great tool for promoting reading and community building, and we’re happy to have a hand in a project whose aims are so close to our own.

You’ll start seeing more about Campus Reading when the SJSU school year begins at the end of August.  Until then, we encourage you to check out the program, to read Drinking Coffee Elsewhere, which is a truly wonderful book, and, of course, to let us know if you have any questions about this program or anything else in the community.  And as always, thanks for being a part of LitMinds!

July 05, 2007

The Long and Short of LitBlogs: Interview with Megan Sullivan of Bookdwarf.com

Megan Sullivan/BookdwarfMegan Sullivan is the blogger behind Bookdwarf, one of the leading American litblogs.  She’s also the head buyer at the Harvard Book Store in Cambridge, Massachusetts.  We were lucky to meet Megan at BEA earlier this year and learn more about her blogging and bookselling.

In her interview with LitMinds, we learned about how she got started in both of her current literary ventures, her thoughts on the future of litblogs and book reviews, and her reading list embarrassment.     


On your blog, Bookdwarf, you talk about everything from the books you’re reading, to your work at the Harvard Book Store, to your opinions on current political events.  How and when did you first begin Bookdwarf, and how has the blog evolved over the years?

I started dating someone who had a blog over four years ago. I was constantly talking about books (because that’s my life) and he suggested I start my own blog, possibly in an attempt to get me to shut up about books. With his computer expertise, I started my own blog in February of 2004.  It took a while to figure out what I was doing, not just technically, but for the format. There are enough sites out there already giving links, so I knew that I didn’t want to do that.  I try to focus on discussion of books and the book world.


One of the subjects you’ve written about frequently is the continual shrinking of book review sections in newspapers, and the competition between newspaper reviewers and literary bloggers.  You’ve said that you will do what you can to save book reviews in newspapers.  Why do you think it’s important to have both sources?  Do you think the two populations can peacefully coexist?  And where do you see the book review industry (with apologies for the use of that word) in 10 years?  


I don’t think that everyone in the world reads litblogs. There are still some non-computer people out there that like to pick up the paper. I think that losing the traditional newspaper book reviews would mean losing a valuable part of our literary tradition. This doesn’t mean that the newspaper should rule and the litblogs aren’t as valid a resource as the papers. I think they can peacefully coexist as long as we all recognize that some will never agree that litblogs are important. I couldn’t care less that Richard Ford thinks bloggers are akin to the crazy shut-in people. That’s his opinion. I know that lots of people----readers, writers, editors, everyone---read my blog. Just because he doesn’t read it, doesn’t mean I’ve failed. I’d rather focus my energy on my primary mission, which is talking about books. I think it’s a waste of time trying to convert people.


You’re now the head buyer at the Harvard Book Store.  Tell us a little bit about how you started working there, what your job is like, and what you love about it.

I moved to the Boston area to get a Masters in Classics at Tufts University. I was lucky enough to get a part time job at the Harvard Book Store working in the customer order department. After several years in school, I realized that I was enjoying working at the store much more than being an academic. So I started working full time as the Buying Office Assistant, a very glamorous job that requires lots of data entry (how do you think all of those titles make it into a store’s inventory?). Eventually someone moved and I started buying backlist (basically reorders of stock). Then I moved up to doing frontlist a few years ago and most recently was made the head of the department (Trade Buying Manager is the official job title, but I like Head Buyer).  

My favorite part of the job is having access to all the books! I spend a lot of time looking at catalogs and sitting through sales appointments. Also I have to make sure that the inventory keeps to the right levels, make sure we have the latest books in stock, etc. We have an extensive event program and I order all of the books for them. Plus keeping on top of what’s being reviewed and who is appearing where in the media. It’s a very detail-oriented job. Mostly I love being a part of the literary world. As a lifelong nerd, I’ve always read a lot, not to mention the fact that I’m a very fast reader. I didn’t know such jobs existed, but spending all day with books is a dream job. I don’t want to be anywhere else right now.


How does the Harvard Book Store, an independent bookseller, match up against some of Boston’s large chain bookstores?  What makes it so successful?   

I know I’m bragging, but I’d say that my store is one of the best book stores in the country. There’s not another store in the Boston area that’s like mine. We’ve got such depth in our backlist---one of the largest philosophy sections around---and we always have the best titles on our shelves. I like to call it separating the wheat from the chaff. At a B&N or Borders, you have to browse through so much crap before getting what you want.  My job is to do this for you. If a book is on our shelves, it’s there for a reason.


You read at least a book a week, according to Bookdwarf.  What are some of your favorites?  What book or books do you think everyone should read?  

Oh boy, I hate this question. I read so much, so it’s hard to narrow it down to several favorites. I’d say that George Eliot’s Middlemarch, Murakami’s Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, and Bronte’s Jane Eyre are some of my all time favorites. Recently I loved Matthew Sharpe’s Jamestown, a post-apocalyptic retelling of the founding of Jamestown; Shalom Auslander’s Foreskins’ Lament (due out this October), a hilarious and painful autobiography by a man who grew up in an Orthodox community; Falling Through the Earth by Danielle Trussoni, which the New York Times named one of the top ten books of 2006, a memoir of a daughter of a Vietnam vet---it’s beautiful and unflinching in its honesty.


Last but not least, our favorite final prompt: Ask yourself any question and answer it.   


Q: Name a book that you’re embarrassed you’ve not read.
A: Lolita---everyone gushes about this book. I usually just smile and nod.

 
You can read Megan's LitMinds profile here and discuss this interview here.   

July 02, 2007

Deception, Desperation, Drag Queens and Stalkers: Interview with Timothy Schaffert, author of Devils in the Sugar Shop

Timothy SchaffertTimothy Schaffert is a novelist from Omaha, Nebraska.  His latest book, Devils in the Sugar Shop, is “a comical whirlwind of deception, adultery, desperation, drag queens, stiff cocktails, nervous breakdowns, an anonymous stalker, and suburban swingers,” and was chosen as a May pick by BookSense, the online consortium of independent bookstores.  According to Time Out Chicago, in Devils “Schaffert writes with precision and charm, and does Omaha some serious justice.”  In addition to writing, Schaffert also directs the Omaha Lit Fest and teaches at the Nebraska Summer Writers Conference.

We talked to Schaffert after the recent release of Devils.  In this interview, he tells us about his inspiration for this latest book, the themes he finds himself drawn to, and the strange way he found to spend three hours last week.  


Your most recent book is Devils in the Sugar Shop, about a hodgepodge of bohemian characters entangled in a web of mismatched sexual and familial relationships.  How did you come up with the idea for the book?   Can you say a little bit about how you discovered and wrote the plot and the characters?


I started writing a short story set entirely within a small glassed-in smoking lounge in an airport.  And as that character, the smoker, contemplated things, I realized she was going back to Omaha, to her friends and relationships there, and I started to wonder about those people too.  Originally, I conceived of each chapter of the novel dwelling on the circumstances and preoccupations of a different point-of-view character, in this introspective, modernist Woolfian fashion, but the novel called for more interaction between the characters.


All of your books (Devils in the Sugar Shop, The Singing and Dancing Daughters of God, and The Phantom Limbs of the Rollow Sisters) have certain elements in common: Nebraska settings, romantic relationships, and humor.  Is it a conscious choice to have these similarities in your works?  Do you sit down with these things in mind when you start a new project, or do they creep in?  Either way, what do you think causes to you choose them?  


I often think that an author doesn’t choose his subject, the subject chooses him.  At least that’s the way it is in my case.  I’m not trying to portray the process as mystical in any way, I do indeed consciously consider the story that I want to tell and the elements required in telling that story, but a writer needs to be open to inspiration, certainly.  Usually the characters come first, and with the exception of the characters in Devils, those characters have been best-suited for rural Nebraska towns—those characters tend to have the kind of ragtag existences fostered by small-town life.  And all my characters tend to be preoccupied with romantic ideals, often sorting through their perceptions of love and the actualities of their romantic relationships.


Devils in the Sugar ShopOne more similarity in your books is the presence of female protagonists.  Author Joni Rodgers said about Devils, “Men should not be allowed to write women this well.”  Why do think you gravitate toward female characters?  Why do you think you write them so convincingly?

Larry McMurtry is often credited with writing about women well, and he was a writer I read much of during my impressionable years.  So maybe I learned something there.  But I also think that women have the sort of rich inner lives that interests me as a writer, and they have very complicated relationships with each other.  I’ve just always enjoyed paying attention to women.


In addition to being an author, you’re also the founder and director of the Omaha Lit Fest.  Tell us a little about the event – what happens there, and how, and why.  How did you start the Lit Fest, and why is it important to you?


Regional writers, and writers from all across the country, get together to meet readers and each other and to sit around and talk about books.  It’s informal, uncensored, unacademic.  We have readings and panel discussions, a party or two, maybe an art exhibit, maybe some music.  The reason I started the festival is because I wanted to host a literary event that wasn’t stuffy and pretentious, but was sophisticated, intelligent, inviting.  There’s often a lot of complaint that people aren’t reading enough, or not enough people are reading, or both, and I grow weary of that approach—bullying people into feeling obligated to read.  I just don’t think it’s that dire.  We just have to be more inventive, more actively involved, in helping readers find writers and vice-versa.  As a matter of fact, communication has become even more text-based over the last ten years, with websites, email—people are reading the news again, instead of having it read to them.  The words we choose to express ourselves are vital to all of us.  This results in a more democratic literary realm, as people self-publish or write their own blogs—resulting perhaps in more writers than there are readers to support them.  But, personally, as a farm boy from central Nebraska, someone who grew up far from any literary center, I find that exciting.  These days a self-published book, or a book published by a micropress, can find its own audience, without having to be part of some corporate system.


Now that Devils in the Sugar Shop has been published, what are you working on?  Can you tell us about your next project?

I’m finishing up a collection of short stories, and working on a new novel—another small-town Nebraska book that I’m kind of thinking of as the third in a loose-linked trilogy (after The Phantom Limbs of the Rollow Sisters and The Singing and Dancing Daughters of God).


What kind of literature do you like to read?  What writers have influenced you, either directly or indirectly?  What are some of your favorite books?

I meet a lot of writers, so I tend to read their books.  I don’t always manage to read the books everyone else is talking about and all the magazines are reviewing, but that’s the joy of it.  The books that get declared the best books of the year aren’t representative of all the good books published.  Some books are blessed with strident and deep-pocketed marketing plans, but most contemporary literature has to fend for itself, and that sense of discovery can be inspiring.  As for writers who’ve influenced me… certainly Faulkner and Eudora Welty.  Probably Stanley Elkin and Larry McMurtry, who are two writers who are about as different as they could be, but I can see them guiding my hand somewhat.  But it’s hard to say whether these writers have influenced me, or if I’ve been drawn to their work because I share a similar sensibility.  I’m probably as influenced by music and movies as I am by books.


Here’s a fun one: ask yourself any question and answer it.


Q:  How long did you spend trying to come up with a great question to ask yourself?
A: Approximately three hours.

 

You can read Timothy Schaffert's LitMinds profile here and discuss this interview here.